- By Ranger, Thai Intel’s political journalist
The Red Shirts leader just said, quote:
“There can be no reconciliation with people who will not accept accountability of the killed protesters.”
International Crisis Group made a great effort trying to quantify the situation with the election at the central point, however, the central point is “Accountability.” The Red Shirts are entirely united on this, and this is a “Massively Important Issue” to the Red Shirts-superseding, even the election.
What ever analysis is made on Thailand, it must start from that “Accountability” point as the central point. Otherwise, the entire analysis will be skewed and does not reflect reality.
The following is from the International Crisis Group
Bangkok/Brussels, 11 April 2011: If Thailand is to minimise the risk of renewed demonstrations and violence, it needs to ensure that forthcoming elections are free and fair and that a legitimate government is formed without any interference from the elite establishment.
The Calm Before Another Storm?, the latest briefing from the International Crisis Group, states that nearly a year after the crackdown on anti-establishment demonstrations, support for the so-called “Red Shirt” movement remains strong and political reconciliation has led almost nowhere. Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has announced that general elections will be held no later than July, but there are rumours that a military coup or another form of subtle intervention could derail the polls.
“While elections are not a magic wand, if installed successfully, the new government will have a fresh mandate and greater credibility to try to bring about genuine political reconciliation”, says Rungrawee Chalermsripinyorat, Crisis Group South East Asia Analyst. “As the stakes are high, the race is likely to be fiercely contested. Domestic, regional, and international monitors and a well publicised electoral code of conduct could help mininise violence and enhance the credibility of the polls”.
On one side of the struggle is the “yellow-shirted” People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) which backs the elite establishment: the monarchy, the military and the judiciary. On the other side are those allied with ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, the “red-shirted” United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD). The conflict has left Thailand deeply polarised. The UDD demonstration in March – May 2010 killed 92 people — including 21 civilians and five soldiers who died a year ago on 10 April — in the most deadly clashes between protestors and the state in modern Thai history. Despite the crackdown, the Red Shirts remain strong and are now preparing to wage a new battle at the ballot box through their electoral wing – the Pheu Thai Party.
The PAD is opposing the forthcoming polls and urging supporters not to vote for any political parties. The leadership claims elections are useless in “dirty” politics and instead envisions the King appointing a “virtuous” leader who will “clean up” politics. Support for the PAD had declined. Its ultra nationalist campaign centred on the Preah Vihear temple dispute with Cambodia is drawing smaller numbers than its rallies in 2008. It is now at odds with its former anti-Thaksin ally, the Democrat Party.
In addition to whether the elections are free and fair, how the new government is formed will be critical in determining the post-election political landscape. A coalition government is likely and its formation is expected to be highly contentious. The Red Shirts have threatened to return to the streets in full force if the Pheu Thai Party emerges as the largest party but does not form the government. Though not unconstitutional, the democratic legitimacy of a government formed by the second largest party will be readily challenged. On the other hand, the PAD and traditional elites would oppose a “proxy” Thaksin government.
“It will still be a challenge for all sides to accept election results. But arm bending by the royalist establishment is an obvious recipe for renewed street protests and violence”, says Jim Della Giacoma, Crisis Group South East Asia Project Director. “Thailand is likely to face continuing mass protests, which have become increasingly violent, until the royalist establishment and elected leaders agree on a new social contract on power sharing as well as the place of traditional elites in a democratic country”.
- Political Intelligence (3): Nation asks “Will Election Solve Thailand’s Problems?” & a Red Shirts who says “Next, is another pro-long protest for accountability” (thaiintelligentnews.wordpress.com)
- Political Intelligence: Bangkok up-for-grabs in next election as turmoil hits every party (thaiintelligentnews.wordpress.com)
- Protest Intelligence: A well known “Democratic Activist” on last year “Bloody April” (thaiintelligentnews.wordpress.com)
- Political Analysis: Wall Street Journal’s Taksin interview “Taksin still as positive as ever” (thaiintelligentnews.wordpress.com)
- Social Psychology Analysis: One day a bad poll & the next day solution is to up the salary (thaiintelligentnews.wordpress.com)
- Thaksin Vows to Assume Role in Affairs (online.wsj.com)
- You: Paint Thailand yellow and red, with a caveat to compromise (search.japantimes.co.jp)
- Thousands of Thai “red shirts” commemorate Bangkok unrest (reuters.com)
- Thai ‘Red Shirts’ mark anniversary of bloody clash (sfgate.com)